Sunday, January 29, 2006

Silencing The Environment Bush Style


Once again, the Bush administration is up to its dirty, little tricks, what with its double-speak, confuse-the-public tactics, and flat-out lies.

In today's New York Times, an article by Andrew Revkin details how one of the country's most respected scientists, Dr. James Hansen (whose picture is posted above), is being silenced by Bush loyalists at NASA because of his speaking out at different enagements, particularly the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, where he discussed that the current federal leadership is doing little or nothing to slow the effects that emissions are having on our environment.

Aside from the fact that this is one of the only administrations that I can remember that is able to politicize the environment, what else was brow-raising was the fact that whenever a Bush loyalist is "found out", as it were, they quickly deny EVERYTHING. I have studied public relations, and I was taught that that is a no-no, particularly, when dealing with highly polarizing issues. One would think that with the spinology that this administration practices everyday, that they would know better by now.

At any rate, this is where we stand in United States: we have an administration that wants us to throw up our hands at sound scientific practice and theory and embrace the religious mumbo-jumbo of intelligent design; And now, we have an administration who, once again, is rejecting sound environmental science and expecting us to accept its politicized non-sense, and the silencing or alienation of those, who disagree. *Sigh*

How can we, as those using reason instead of pure emotion to guide and lead our lives, fight this behemoth? What can we do to push back against this might of wrong-headed policies, muddled science and lie-telling? Of course, we must fight back, but how?

Sunday, January 22, 2006

Conscious Consumerism

Have you looked around your home lately? Televisions in every room, and in some cases, DVD players to boot along with those televisions; multiple appliances in the kitchen that you don't even know where to store them, the garage, storage closet or basement filled with junk that you probably haven't used or even seen in the last six months? Your closet bulging with clothing that you haven't worn in years. Sounds like you? Well, it sounds like a lot of us.

Now, I'm not one to preach about the coming doom of our planets dimise because of our current actions, even though I believe that a lot of that could actually happen, but we should all do our part to really take a look at how we live our lives. Okay, so we can afford an extra television in Johnny's room, but is it truly necessary? Should Johnny even have his own television set in his room already? Is he even ready for it? And, yes, Suzie is becoming "of age" where she wants her own life, but does she really need a car at 16? Can't she simply use the city bus and her bicycle a few more years? Okay, so that $200 pair of jeans is going to look sexy on you, but do you need yet another pair of jeans...again?

The point I'm trying to make is that many of us, and sometimes I'm a victim of this, are too quick to purchase yet more stuff. Some people use the argument: "Well, past generations wasted too, why should we have to be the "conscious" ones when they got to live a life of waste and pollution?" First, that is not exactly true, in that, we can easily be deemed as the most wasteful generation, what with our SUV's and large homes. Some statistics place current homes being built at 7 - 9 times larger than the typical suburban home built in the 1970's. Also, because goods are a lot "cheaper", we are able to consume a lot more, harming, to some extent, the environment. I'm also inclined to believe that when we pay for a "cheaper" good or service, someone else is footing the bill, and usually it is a person who is miles away working for pay that is pennies on the dollar per hour. Finally, our predecessors did not have the knowledge that we now have, and, if I may say so, take for granted. We cannot hold them responsible for actions that they did not know were causing damage to themselves and the environment. Today, we have the knowledge and the information and they can empower us to do better. Sadly, though, most of us don't want to. We want to live like, if not outdo, the Joneses, leaving a path of environmental degradation and even personal debt in the wake of mass-consumption.

What's the solution? Well, there is no ONE solution, but this year, I've made a vow to be more conscious about my spending habits. When I purchase even a book, I think about perhaps purchasing an "online" version, rather than a hard copy (that uses up so much shelf space) where I can read it on the screen or print a chapter or two (on both sides of the sheet, lol) when necessary. Also, I'm planning on having more candle-light dinners. It's a nice and cozy way to get to know your significant other or your closest friends while saving some energy; I want to drive less, save more money, buy less but more quality clothing and eat less but more quality, nutritious foods. Of course, this is just the beginning, and as I get better at it, I'm going to devise a plan that I'll put together in an "idea-blog" for other readers to take part in. These are just a few ways that I'm going to do my part. So far, so good. Yes!

Sunday, January 15, 2006

M.L.K.,Jr.Day & Adult-Leadership

Tomorrow is Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, and a write-up in the Miami Herald claims that only 15% of whites and 66% of blacks will be partaking in festivities to celebrate his birth. Of course, I do not want to make this into a "racial" issue, but shame on ALL Americans. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. has done so much to shed light on human rights issues, and though this might seem like quite the cliche, his legacy does, in fact, live on until today. In addition, he died such a horrible death, and his holiday is not even a federally-mandated holiday.

This is really discouraging, but this reveals the truth that historic figures who are associated with peace do not get the same attention with those who were involved with war. What does this say about our future since wars are becoming less prevalent in our society? Who will be our new heroes? Oh-that's right- basketball players and hip-hop stars.

Those who are on the forefront of making this world better, not their personal financial portfolios, should, indeed, be placed on a pedestal and should be bastions of what every child would want to be. Gone are the days of the Roman gladiators, who lived lives of blood and violence. Every child during that time wanted to be like them. Today, those gladiators have been replaced by music, sports and other entertainment icons. Though, on the surface this might not seem to be a "big deal", when one digs deeper, she would realize that many of the young people that other young people idealize are not quite the great figures of heroism, and sadly so, considering that -- due to technology -- these icons are so visible.

This is where parents, teachers and community leaders can play a big role. As a matter of fact, adults on a whole can play a big role in showing young people that the everyday person, not necessarily pop icons, can, in fact, be heroes and good examples. The problem, it seems, is that adults have kind of stepped back and allowed the media to raise our children, but that's content for another blog.

Finally, adults need to step forward and quit complaing about "young people today", and be the shining light and beacons of hope that we are supposed to be. Like Dr. King, we should not be afraid. Now is the time to really make a difference. When the kids playing in the street get loud and rowdy and begin fighting or what-have-you, we, as adults, should not just hang our heads and walk or drive by, we should stop and break it up. When we see children misbehave, we should not be afraid to repremand them. On the other hand, when we see children doing good things, we should not hesitate to encourage them. When we see that they need our help, we should not hesitate to offer assistance. It's high time. It's not too late to win the fight for our children, whether or not you biologically gave birth to them is beside the point. YOU, my dear adult, can be a leader, a hero just like Dr. King!

Sunday, January 08, 2006

New Year's Resolutions: a Necessary Evil

Well, the new year has finally arrived. I was chatting with a friend last night, and we were discussing how he was relieved that 2005 was finally over. According to him, it was a "hellish" year. Next, I chatted briefly with another colleague of mine, and she, too, was relieved that 2005 was finally over. According to her, 2006 is going to be "her year".
Well, isn't that just it? At the beginning of each year, while we revel, party and bask in the company of friends and family, we--with aspirations of job promotions, long-lasting, intimate relationships, greater physical strength and fitness and educational endeavors-- make all sorts of resolutions and promises to ourselves and others, knowing full-well that many of them -- if any -- will not be fulfilled, knowing that -- in fact-- the year may end up being a complete disaster. I'm sure that the thousands of Tsunami victims and their families would never have thought in their wildest dreams that 2004 would have ended so tragically. Additionally, the many who perished and who lost their homes and family in the Hurricane Katrina disaster did not hope, wish for or ever dream of that to happen to them.
However, that's just the radomness of life. That ever truthful cliche: "...One never knows..." is what comes to my mind, here. But, that's just it: we really never know, and that gives us even more reason to make positive resolutions and even to write them down. Often, I chat with people at the beginning of each year, and many of them say things like: "I don't make new year's resolutions", and, of course, the reasons vary tremendously. One of the unique ones of the bunch was: "I don't make new year's resolutions because it's...Like...I'm giving myself an excuse to set up myself for failure." Quite dramatic, I thought when I heard that excuse.
Formulating new year's resolutions, though, does not set us up for failure. Quite the opposite. New year's resolutions give us a map. Hey, life is already so random, so unpredictable. Having some form of map or goal makes the journey that much easier. It's like I always say: "A map doesn't mean that you have to stick to a specific route, a good map, however, shows you all the routes that you can take whenever and however you want to." In other words, setting goals for ourselves isn't a means to set up ourselves for failure. It's simply a tool that helps us to put into focus the very things that we've always hoped and wished for, but never had the guts to embrace. New year's resolutions help us say to ourselves: This is my life on my terms. Now, how often do we get to express, in writing, that premise? How often do we write something down that is a direct -- not a metaphoric -- declaration of how WE are going to run OUR OWN lives?
New year's resolutions, then, are a necessary evil. So what if we don't stick to all of them? The very fact that we articulated them in the first place speaks to the capacity we have as humans to be unique. In this corporate world of sameness and going with the grain, as opposed to against it, new year's resolutions give us a reason to be OURSELVES.

Musings on Car Culture Pt. 1

On Saturday, while I was riding to a near-by Bellsouth payment center to pay my telephone bill, I happened to pass by a car dealership that was having some sort of special event, as there was loud music blaring from one of the local radio station's mobile units. The music was good, but unbelievably loud, and it must have been disturbing the surrounding businesses. Secondly, because of all the commotion, many motorists began slowing their vehicles to get a glimse of what was going on, creating a traffic nightmare.

When I finally parked and locked up my bike, I could only shake my head in amazement. Here again is one more way the car or automobile can be a nuisance. From even before they leave the lot, they are causing the community troubles. However, in our fast-paced societies, we don't even realize it.

Just tonight, I was watching "40-Year-Old Virgin" with my brother, and the main character, Andy, rides a bicycle as his basic mode of transportation, as opposed to driving a car. Throughout the movie, as enjoyable as it was, snide remarks are made about him being childish because he rides a bicycle and he is basically viewed as being "nerdy" or "quirky" for doing so, but when I think back on that event at the car dealership, I can't help but think: who's being childish? Here we have a car dealership having to play loud music to get the attention of drivers because no one really walks in that area, due to the fact that it is built for cars, not people, so they have to be as loud as can be to get the drivers' attention. Secondly, who, like toddlers, whine most about traffic and gas prices and about having to drive around the corner to get a gallon of milk and about roads being wider? motorists do, even though most municipalities bow down and worship them, catering to their every need.

After watching the movie and thinking back on that car dealership's 'event' to rake in the sales, all I could do was utter an internal snicker, knowing that cyclists actually make the roads safer for motorists, and they, the motorists, don't even know it. Bicycle-commuters are generally happier and more in-tuned with her/his community. If adulthood means owning a gas-guzzling, environment/community destroying vehicle, and if caring about the environment, my community, my health and the welfare of others is being childish, then pass me the pacifier.